Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies
Vol 5 (2021): August
Islam and Other Religions

Social Prejudice, Ethnicity, and Effectiveness of Communication, Against Tolerance Between Religious People in Sidoarjo Regency
Prasangka Sosial, Etnisitas, dan Efektivitas Komunikasi, Terhadap Toleransi Antar Umat Beragama Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo


View Article Suplementary File
Similarity Check Result
  • Adimas Mahakim,
  • Totok Wahyu Abadi
Adimas Mahakim
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Totok Wahyu Abadi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijis.v5i0.1591
Published August 25, 2021
Keywords
  • Interpersonal,
  • Communication,
  • Tolerance

Copyright (c) 2021 Adimas Mahakim, Totok Wahyu Abadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study aims to describe and explain social prejudice between religious communities in Sidoarjo Regency. This research is based on a bombing case that occurred some time ago which was carried out by several individuals and occurred in the Sidoarjo area which is related to inter-religious communities. This research uses quantitative research. Data was collected by means of interviews, observations, and relevant studies. The data collection technique used is by using a questionnaire or questionnaire method. The results of this study indicate that partially or individually the social prejudice variable has a significant value on religious tolerance in Sidoarjo Regency of 0.843; the ethnicity variable has a significant value on religious tolerance in Sidoarjo Regency of 0.729; and the communication effectiveness variable has a significant value on religious tolerance in Sidoarjo Regency of 0.741 that the independent variables are rejected by the dependent variable. Then if it is reviewed simultaneously or together with the variables of social prejudice, ethnicity and the effectiveness of interpersonal communication on tolerance between religious communities in Sidoarjo Regency it is 3% while the remaining 97% is influenced by other variables outside the variables used in this study.

View Article Suplementary File
Similarity Check Result

References

  1. P. S. H. Guntoro Sazali, Subejo B, “PENGUATAN TOLERANSI AGAMA ‘ANALISIS KOMUNIKASI PEMBANGUNAN AGAMA’ (Studi Pemerintahan Kota Bogor),” J. Komun., 2015.
  2. P. Riyanti, “RELASI SOSIAL PEDAGANG ETNIS CINA DAN ETNIS JAWA DI PASAR TRADISIONAL,” Int. J. Indones. Soc. Cult., pp. 53–63, 2013.
  3. I. Adelina, F., Hanurawan, F., Suhanti, & Yasminum, “HUBUNGAN ANTARA PRASANGKA SOSIAL DAN INTENSI MELAKUKAN DISKRIMINASI MAHASISWA ETNIS JAWA TERHADAP MAHASISWA YANG BERASAL DARI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR,” J. Sains Psikol., pp. 1–8, 2017.
  4. S. Bachri, S., Lutfi, I., “PENGARUH RELIGIUSITAS DAN KEPRIBADIAN LIMA FAKTOR TERHADAP PRASANGKA SOSIAL KEPADA JAMA’AH TABLIGH,” TAZKIYA J. Psychol., pp. 227–242, 2013.
  5. Sugiyono, METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF KUALITATIF DAN R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.
  6. M. L. J, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009.
  7. A. Sujianto, Aplikasi Statistik dengan SPSS 16.0. Jakarta: PT. Prestasi Pustakaraya, 2009.
  8. S. & A. Hermawan, METODE PENELITIAN BISNIS PENDEKATAN KUANTITATIF DAN KUALITATIF. Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2016.
  9. B. Bungin, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Komunikasi, Ekonomi, dan Kebijakan Publik Serta Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: KENCANA PRENADAMEDIA GROUP, 2005.
  10. C. Juditha, “Streotip dan Prasangka dalam Konflik Etnis Tionghoa dan Bugis Makassar,” Ilmu Komun., pp. 87–104, 2015.