The Role of Education Operating Costs Against the Output on Madrasah Aliyah in Indonesia
Peran Biaya Operasional Pendidikan Terhadap Output Pendidikan Madrasah Aliyah
-
(1) * Muhammad Imad
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the role of fishers’ operational costs on the output of education in Madrasah Aliyah in Cimahi. This research uses descriptive study method because the problems studied are actual and factual so that researchers are able to study intensively about the background of the present situation. In this study, the authors used several data collection techniques, namely observation, interviews and documentation studies. In this study, there were 2 Aliyah Madrasas which became the object of the sample to be used as a comparison so that the researchers knew the role of educational operational costs on educational output namely Madrasah Aliyah Mutiteknik Asih Putera and Madrasah Aliyah Al-Farisy. Whereas the output of education in this study is seen from the value of the average NEM of Student Exams from each school. From various data obtained by the author about elite objects, the results of the study indicate that the role of educational operational costs in this study has an influence on educational output. This means that the high average operational costs of education result in better outputs of education.
References
D. Supriadi, Satuan Biaya Pendidikan (Dasar dan Menengah). Bandung: Rosda, 2004.
I. A. E. Sanjiwani, “Analisis Biaya Pendidikan Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kualitas Proses Pembe- lajaran Dan Aspirasi Pendidikan Siswa (Studi Ten- tang Persepsi Para Siswa SMA Dwijendra Denpasar Tahun Pelajaran,” Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 2, 2012.
Syamsudin, Medan, 2009.
Y. K. Ekasari, “Pengaruh Biaya Pendidikan Dan Kinerja Guru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa: Studi Deskriptif Analitis Pada Sma Negeri Di Kabupaten Purwakarta,” 2013.
“Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.”
R. Flower, “Cost and quality of higher education,” The Education Digest, vol. 64, no. 2, 1998, ProQuest Education Journals pg.
R. Elberts, National Academy of Sciences Confer- ence entitled Devising Incentives to Promote Human Capital. California: Irvine, 1999, Teacher Perfor- mance incentives and Student Outcomes.
S. Mallet, S. Wren, M. Dawes, A. Blinco, and
H. Brett, “Optimising Teacher Input - Maximising Output,” Mathematics Teaching, pp. 38–40, 2009.
R. T. Jackson, R. J. Murnane, and J. B. Willett, “Do worker absences affect productivity? The case of teachers,” International Labour Review, vol. 147, no. 1, 2008, ProQuest Education Journals. pg. 71.
T. A. Sutikno, “Indikator Produktivitas Kerja Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan,” Teknologi dan Keju- ruan, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 107–118, 2009.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kuali- tatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2008.
N. Fattah, Analisis Hubungan Pembiayaan Pen- didikan Sekolah Dasar dengan Mutu Proses dan Hasil Belajar, and others, Ed. Bandung: Mimbar Pendidikan, 1999.
W. Ahlgrim and Richard, A Through and Efficient Education: School Funding, Student Achivement and Productuvity. Indiana: Terre Haute, 2010.
Copyright (c) 2018 Muhammad Imad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
