SEMA Number 3 of 2023 and Divorce Regulation in Sidoarjo Court
Nomor SEMA 3 Tahun 2023 dan Peraturan Perceraian di Pengadilan Sidoarjo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21070/ijis.v13i3.1820Keywords:
SEMA No. 3 of 2023, Divorce, Religious Court, Legal Policy, Islamic LawAbstract
General Background: Divorce rates in Indonesia have shown a consistent increase, prompting the Supreme Court to issue various regulations aimed at maintaining marital harmony. Specific Background: One of these efforts is Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 3 of 2023, which introduces a six-month separation requirement before divorce can be granted in Religious Courts. Knowledge Gap: Despite its legal intent, limited empirical evidence exists on how this regulation affects divorce dynamics at the local court level. Aims: This study investigates the implementation of SEMA No. 3 of 2023 and its practical role in reducing divorce cases at the Sidoarjo Religious Court. Results: Findings reveal that while the policy initially reduced divorce numbers in 2023, the effect was temporary, with cases increasing again in subsequent years due to its non-binding nature. Novelty: The research offers a contextual empirical analysis of SEMA’s role within Indonesia’s Islamic judicial system. Implications: Strengthening the juridical framework and integrating social counseling mechanisms are crucial for ensuring the sustainability of family law reforms in Islamic courts.
Highlights:
-
SEMA functions as an internal legal guideline, not binding law.
-
Its temporary effect underscores the need for legal reinforcement.
-
Integration with counseling programs can enhance long-term outcomes.
Keywords: SEMA No. 3 of 2023, Divorce, Religious Court, Legal Policy, Islamic Law
References
[1] R. Ramadani and S. Affan, “Juridical Analysis of SEMA No. 3 of 2023 on Divorce Cases in the Stabat Religious Court,” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, 2024.
[2] U. Hasanah, “The Impact of Parental Divorce on Children's Psychology,” Agenda: Journal of Gender and Religion Analysis, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 18, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.31958/agenda.v2i1.1983.
[3] M. C. Febriansyah, “Divorce Case Decisions Due to Disputes and Separation of Residence Less Than 6 Months Based on SEMA No. 3 of 2023: A Study at the Malang Regency Religious Court,” Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indonesia, 2024.
[4] M. A. G. Fatah, “The Position of SEMA as a Basis for Judges’ Legal Considerations,” Transparansi Hukum, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 133–137, 2024, doi: 10.30737/transparansi.v7i1.5462.
[5] K. Faridah, “Comparison of the Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2017 on Guidelines for Adjudicating Women Facing the Law in Divorce Cases (A Study at the Religious Court and District Court of Madiun City),” Family Issue Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 61–161, 2020.
[6] M. Rihdo, I. M. Sudur, A. R. Suardi, S. Pamungkas, and F. P. Meilinda, “The Position of Supreme Court Circular Letters (SEMA) from the Academic Perspective: Legal Strength, Determination, and Consistency, Influence on Legal Decisions,” Usrah: Journal of Islamic Family Law, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 230–240, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.46773/usrah.v4i2.791.
[7] A. Burhanuddin, “Analysis of Siyasah Qadha’iyyah on Divorce Cases Due to Continuous Disputes and Conflicts in Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 3 of 2023,” Journal of Islamic Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, 2024.
[8] F. Permatasari, “Implementation of SEMA No. 3 of 2023 on Religious Chamber Formulations in the Effort to Apply the Principle of Making Divorce Difficult in Magelang Regency (A Case Study at the Mungkid Religious Court),” Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indonesia, 2024.
[9] M. Sarman, “Judges’ Consideration in Rejecting Divorce Petitions Based on SEMA No. 3 of 2023 (Analysis of Decision No. 1119/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Srg),” Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/83289
[10] P. C. Tambun, N. E. Wardhani, and S. Noor, “Considerations of Religious Court Judges on Divorce Due to Short-Term Separation (Study of Decision No. 375 Pdt.G/2024/PA.Plk),” Al-Hikmah: Journal of Religion and Science, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 105–115, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.25299/ajaip.2025.vol22(1).21698.
[11] M. A. Saidi, “Ratio Legis of Norm Changes and Reasons for Divorce Due to Disputes and Continuous Conflicts in Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 3 of 2023,” Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri KH Abdurrahman Wahid, Pekalongan, Indonesia, 2024.
[12] Zikrullah, “Review of Judges’ Independence in Interpreting SEMA No. 3 of 2023: Legal Formulation of the Religious Chamber on Marriage Law (A Study at the Probolinggo City Religious Court),” Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indonesia, 2024.
[13] M. Rihdo, I. M. Sudur, A. R. Suardi, S. Pamungkas, and F. P. Meilinda, “The Position of Supreme Court Circular Letters (SEMA) from the Academic Perspective: Legal Strength, Determination, and Consistency, Influence on Legal Decisions,” Usrah: Journal of Islamic Family Law, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 230–240, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.46773/usrah.v4i2.791.
[14] M. Mutsaniyah, “Analysis of Verstek Decisions in Jember Religious Court: A Study on the Non-Application of Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 3 of 2023 in Divorce Cases,” Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indonesia, 2025.
[15] E. Rosnawati, M. T. Multazam, S. D. Khotimah, and R. R. Pahlevy, “Penal Mediation as an Alternative Resolution for Domestic Violence Cases,” Jure: Journal of Law and Sharia, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 61–71, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.18860/j-fsh.v10i2.4888.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shofi Mauline Athaliah Taqi, Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
